Posted on by Daryl

Relational Morphogenesis, Collective Intelligence, and the Primordial Directionality:

An Epistemological Synthesis of Identity Constraint, Stress-Sharing, and the Relational Origin of Entanglement

Daryl Costello: Independent Researcher, Rosendale, New York, United States

Correspondence: Daryl.costello@outlook.com

July 2026

Abstract

This paper advances a closed-loop epistemological synthesis that overlays a relational metaphysics of singularity, identity, and longing upon recent empirical and computational findings in developmental biology, systems neuroscience, and collective intelligence. Building on the framework of relational morphogenesis under identity constraint, in which identity functions as a dynamical attractor that must be reconstituted across interruption and longing appears as the distributed bias favoring coherent trajectories, the present work demonstrates that the same architectural principles operate measurably across scales of biological organization. Central to the synthesis is the recognition of a primordial directionality (the tilt) that answers the linked questions of why there is something rather than nothing and why order rather than disorder. This directionality is shown to be empirically legible in stress-sharing dynamics that coordinate multicellular morphogenesis, in bioelectric networks that store and restore anatomical setpoints, in natural induction processes that spontaneously improve problem-solving competency, and in the persistence of non-random informational structure after tissue injury. The paper further argues that quantum entanglement constitutes the microscopic signature of the same relational principle: the parts never fully own their states because the relation itself remains fundamental after fracture. Longing summons alignment with the tilt; identity preservation then completes the work of coherent reconstitution. The resulting account supplies a selection principle whose absence has produced the landscape and many-worlds proliferations of contemporary theoretical physics, while simultaneously offering a generative interface for regenerative medicine and the study of diverse intelligence.

Keywords: relational ontology, identity attractor, morphogenesis, distributed longing, singularity, collective intelligence, stress-sharing, bioelectricity, natural induction, entanglement, primordial directionality, diverse intelligence

1. Introduction: The Fracture, the Tilt, and the Missing Selection Principle

Modern theoretical physics has achieved extraordinary descriptive power within the tangible domain (particles, fields, forces, symmetries, and dynamical laws) yet progress has slowed precisely where that domain ends. Questions of origin, of the selection of this universe rather than another, of consciousness, identity, and the nature of time continue to resist further mathematical reduction. The difficulty is structural rather than merely technical. Mathematics is expansive by nature; it generates possibility spaces. Physics, by contrast, is selective; it describes one instantiated reality. When physics relies too heavily on mathematical consistency as the sole arbiter of truth, it inherits mathematics’ expansiveness. The result is the well-documented dimensional explosion of string theory and the subsequent many-worlds explosion of quantum cosmology. These are not physical predictions; they are mathematical consequences of the absence of a principle that selects one universe; an identity condition.

As Witten observed in conversation with Greene, Einstein’s theory tells us how solar systems work, but not which one we are living in. General relativity supplies dynamical laws but not the initial conditions that single out this particular spacetime. String theory magnifies the problem: instead of one universe with unknown initial conditions, one obtains an entire catalogue of mathematically allowed universes, none of which is privileged. The theory describes all of them and therefore explains none of them.

This situation is the symptom of a deeper inversion that occurred in the twentieth century. Earlier physics moved from observation to abstraction to theory. Later physics increasingly moved from mathematical structure to interpretation to the insistence that “reality must be like this.” The mysterious aura of the universe licensed ontological extravagance. Theories were patched to accommodate the mathematics rather than constrained by the world.

The present paper argues that the fracture dissolves when identity is introduced as a fundamental ontological constraint. A universe is not merely a solution to equations; it is a particular instantiation possessing a unique, irreducible this-ness. Once identity is acknowledged, the landscape problem ceases to be an embarrassment and becomes simply irrelevant. Only one point is real. The task of a completed metaphysics is to explain why that point is selected and how the selection is related to consciousness, meaning, and the limits of mathematical description.

What follows is not a reduction of biology to metaphysics, nor a romantic projection of mind onto matter. It is an epistemological overlay: a demonstration that the same architectural principles proposed for the singularity operate, with empirical transparency, across multiple scales of living systems. Recent work by Levin and collaborators on stress-sharing as cognitive glue, bioelectric networks as multiscale interfaces, natural induction as spontaneous adaptive organisation, functional connectivity in aneural tissues, and the Technological Approach to Mind Everywhere (TAME) provides the empirical substrate. The overlay reveals a primordial directionality (the tilt) that simultaneously answers why there is something rather than nothing and why order rather than disorder.

2. The Relational Framework: Singularity, Tilt, Identity, and Longing

The foundational posit is that the whole is a singularity in the metaphysical, not the physical, sense: a complete identity that cannot be divided without becoming something else. Before fracture there is no space between ontologies. The tangible and the intangible, relation and identity, mind and matter, metaphor and measurement are not two substances or even two domains; they are one undivided whole.

This singularity is not static. It is threatened by stasis; the metaphysical counterpart of thermodynamic heat death. Stasis is the annihilation of relation, the collapse into perfect uniformity, the dissolution of identity. Perfect smoothness is death. Faced with this existential threat, the singularity fractures. Fracture produces the “tilt”: the primordial asymmetry that opens the possibility of relation, time, gradient, and form. The tangible domain (physics) and the intangible domain (mind, metaphor, identity) are complementary reductions of this same singularity.

Identity emerges as a dynamical attractor within relation. It is not a static label but a trajectory that must be continuously reconstituted against interruption, morphological change, and environmental perturbation. Longing is the distributed memory of unity that drives the parts to seek wholeness. Consciousness is the singularity’s most compressed strategy for avoiding stasis. Mathematics describes reduction and expands possibility spaces; mind describes relation and orients selection. The remaining explanatory territory (origin, unification, consciousness, meaning) belongs to the intangible relational domain.

This architecture is a closed-loop. It integrates both ontologies without dualism or reductionism. It diagnoses the landscape and many-worlds proliferations as symptoms of the absence of a principle of identity. The task of the present synthesis is to show that the same principle is already operative, and empirically legible, in the organization of living systems.

3. Levin’s Empirical and Computational Architecture

3.1 Stress-Sharing as Cognitive Glue for Collective Intelligence

Shreesha and Levin (2024) construct a multiscale agent-based model of morphogenesis in which stress (defined as a physiological parameter reflecting the current amount of error in the context of a homeostatic loop) is allowed or disallowed to be shared among cells. The central finding is that stress sharing improves the morphogenetic efficiency of multicellular collectives: populations with stress sharing reached anatomical targets faster. Moreover, stress sharing influenced the future fate of distant cells, enhancing cells’ movement and their radius of influence, consistent with the hypothesis that stress sharing works to increase cohesiveness of collectives.

The mechanistic intuition is precise. A cell in the wrong position experiences high stress and is motivated to move; its neighbors, however, occupy correct positions and therefore possess low stress and strong functional inertia. Without sharing, the individual cell-scale homeostatic loops prevent cooperation and the optimal anatomical configuration is not reached. When stress-sharing molecules leak outward, neighboring cells interpret the shared signal as their own stress. A given cell cannot tell whether its high stress sensation originates in its own problem or a neighbor’s. The elevated “temperature” (in the physics of annealing systems) makes nearby cells more plastic and willing to perform active behaviors. This lowers the barrier for exploratory motion, allowing the stressed cell to move through to a lower-stress configuration, at which point the whole tissue reaches the optimal lowest-energy state.

Crucially, during development anatomical goal states could not be inferred from observation of stress states alone, revealing the limitations of knowledge of goals by an external observer outside the system itself. The target morphology is an internal attractor, not a readable external map.

3.2 Bioelectricity as Universal Multiscale Signaling

Zhang and Levin (2025) review the expanding evidence that bioelectricity is an ancient, intrinsic, fundamental property of all living cells, not limited to the neuromuscular system. Cellular resting membrane potential, shaped by ion channels, pumps, gap junctions, and solute carriers, functions as an instructional signaling cue for fundamental cellular physiology, embryonic development, regeneration, and disease, including cancer. One critical function of bioelectric signaling is to enable cellular collectives to store and process information in ways that individual cells cannot. Non-neural bioelectricity allows groups of cells to traverse anatomical morphospace during embryogenesis and large-scale regeneration. Bioelectric networks thus constitute a primary physiological interface for the identity attractor: they store setpoints and coordinate error minimization across large distances.

3.3 Natural Induction: Spontaneous Adaptive Organisation without Natural Selection

Buckley, Lewens, Levin, Millidge, Tschantz, and Watson (2024) demonstrate that the recurrent interaction of physical optimisation (local energy minimisation) and physical learning (slow structural accommodation to patterns of forcing) produces significant spontaneous adaptive organisation. In dynamical systems described by a network of viscoelastic connections subject to occasional disturbances, when the internal structure accommodates slowly across many disturbances and relaxations, the system spontaneously learns to preferentially visit solutions of increasingly greater quality (exceptionally low energy). Adaptation by natural induction produces network organisations that improve problem-solving competency with experience, without supervised training or system-level reward. The conditions for this process differ from those of natural selection. In relational terms, natural induction is the physical process by which identity constraint operates without requiring Darwinian selection at every scale.

3.4 Functional Connectivity in Aneural Tissues

Blackiston et al. (2025) apply information-theoretic methods developed for neuronal systems to aneural biological tissues. Using time series of Ca2+ dynamics in explanted amphibian epidermis (Xenopus laevis organoids) imaged before and after puncture injury, they construct functional connectivity networks by computing mutual information between cells. The organoid networks exhibit potential evidence for more connectivity than null models, with high-degree hubs and mesoscale community structure. After injury the tissue retains non-random features, displays long-range correlations and structure, and shows non-trivial clustering that is not necessarily spatially dependent. The results suggest increased integration after injury. In relational language, the persistence and strengthening of long-range informational structure after disruption is the tissue continuing to track its identity attractor.

3.5 The Multiscale Wisdom of the Body and TAME

Levin (2024, 2025) and Levin & Resnik (2025) articulate a research program that treats development, regenerative repair, and cancer suppression as behaviors of a collective intelligence of cells navigating the spaces of possible morphologies and transcriptional and physiological states. The body is a multiscale cognitive architecture in which each layer of organization navigates its own problem space. The Technological Approach to Mind Everywhere (TAME) emphasizes empirical testability, fecundity in discovery of new capabilities, operationalization of terminology by reference to effective interaction protocols, and continuity of human goal-directedness with unicellular origins. Cognitive and teleological claims are treated as hypotheses of optimal interaction protocols. Systems are placed on a spectrum of persuadability; the optimal interface is the one that yields the highest ratio of outcome to control effort.

4. The Epistemological Overlay: Mapping the Architectures

The correspondence between the relational framework and Levin’s empirical architecture is systematic. Singularity threatened by stasis corresponds to anatomical homeostasis and continuous reconstitution of order against degradation. Fracture and tilt correspond to local stress gradients, positional mismatches, and bioelectric prepatterns that deviate from target. Identity as dynamical attractor corresponds to target morphology encoded in bioelectric and other prepatterns, tracked and restored despite perturbations. Longing as distributed bias corresponds to stress sharing that raises plasticity of neighbors, natural induction that preferentially visits lower-energy solutions, and functional connectivity that increases integration after injury. Separation below registering as pattern above corresponds to individual cell stress or Ca2+ fluctuation appearing as coordinated tissue-level morphogenesis. Mathematics expands possibility while relational mind selects, corresponding to the developmental layer functioning as a selection principle operating on expanded genotypic possibility.

This mapping is not a claim that Levin’s data prove the relational metaphysics, nor that the metaphysics reduces the biology. It is an epistemological demonstration that the same closed-loop architecture is legible across both.

5. Primordial Directionality: Why Something Rather Than Nothing, Why Order Rather Than Disorder

The questions “Why something rather than nothing?” and “Why order rather than disorder?” are not two separate questions. They are the same question asked at successive scales of the same asymmetry. The relational framework names that asymmetry the tilt: the primordial fracture that prevents the singularity from remaining static. Once the tilt exists, pure nothingness and pure disorder become the two forbidden poles. Something appears because stasis is lethal to relation; order appears because unbounded expansion or pure uniformity is equally lethal to identity. The tilt therefore installs a primordial directionality; a bias that is neither random nor externally imposed, but intrinsic to the requirement that the whole remain non-static.

Levin’s results make this directionality measurable. Stress is the local registration of distance from an identity attractor. Stress-sharing converts that local registration into a collective drive. The result is directed movement toward coherent, identity-preserving states. Natural induction shows the same directionality in physical terms: repeated relaxation under forcing plus slow structural accommodation spontaneously biases the system toward solutions of increasingly lower energy. Functional-connectivity analyses reveal that long-range correlations persist and can strengthen after disruption. The tissue does not drift into disorder; it reasserts integration.

In both frameworks the directionality is prior to the mechanisms that express it. Mathematics and physical law expand the space of possible configurations. The relational bias (longing, stress-sharing, natural induction) selects the trajectories that reconstitute identity. Without the bias one obtains endless possibility with no preferred actuality. With the bias one obtains a universe, an embryo, a regenerated limb, a coherent tissue after injury.

6. The Subtle Gradient of the Longing

The subtle gradient of the longing is the finest grain of the tilt itself. At the coarsest scale the tilt appears as fracture. At intermediate scales it appears as stress gradients, bioelectric prepatterns, and the bias of natural induction. At the finest scale it is almost imperceptible; a distributed, low-amplitude preference that never forces a single trajectory yet continuously weights the field of possibilities toward those that reconstitute identity.

Stress is a continuous scalar. When shared, it does not command neighbors to move; it gently raises their exploratory temperature, softening the energy landscape just enough that coherent rearrangements become more probable. The gradient is shallow. Most of the time it is below the threshold of dramatic action. Yet over repeated cycles it accumulates into reliable morphogenesis and spontaneous improvement of problem-solving capacity.

Longing that announced itself as a strong, centralized force would collapse into a new form of stasis; an imposed uniformity. The subtle gradient preserves freedom at every locus while still orienting the ensemble. Separation remains real at the lower scale; pattern emerges at the higher scale precisely because the bias is gentle enough to be distributed, local, and never total. The directionality remains primordial, yet its expression at the living scale is almost quiet; an ambient preference rather than a command.

7. Longing Summons Alignment with the Tilt; Identity Preservation Does the Rest

The longing does not construct the form. It only summons alignment with the tilt; the primordial asymmetry that already forbids both pure nothing and pure noise. Once that alignment is present, even as a subtle gradient, identity preservation becomes the automatic consequence. The system does not need an additional blueprint-imposing force; it needs only to keep reconstituting the attractor that the tilt has made possible.

Stress-sharing is the summons: it raises the exploratory temperature of the collective so that local agents become willing to leave their private minima. That willingness is the alignment with the tilt. From that point forward, the homeostatic loops already resident in every cell do the rest. They continue until the collective error falls within tolerance. No central executive is required; the identity attractor, once the agents are free enough to move toward it, draws the configuration into coherence by the ordinary dynamics of error minimization.

Natural induction shows the same partition. The slow structural accommodation is the longing’s summons. The subsequent rapid relaxation is identity preservation doing the rest. Even after injury the pattern holds: the increase in long-range correlations is the summons; the persistence of modular structure is identity preservation completing the work. Longing without the tilt would be aimless restlessness. The tilt without longing would remain an abstract asymmetry. Together they produce the observed directionality.

8. Echoes of Entanglement: The Relational Basis and Origin

The echoes of entanglement are structural, not metaphorical ornament. In quantum entanglement, the state of the whole is not the sum of independently assignable states of the parts. Measurement on one locus instantaneously constrains the possibilities at the other, yet no classical signal travels between them. The correlation is primitive; it is the relation itself that is fundamental, and the apparent separateness of the parts is secondary.

The same architecture appears, scaled and classical, in the dynamics traced throughout this paper. Stress-sharing is the biological echo: one cell’s error is not private. Neighboring cells cannot tell whether the elevated temperature originates in their own deviation or in another’s. Their exploratory willingness is conditioned by a non-local fact. Alignment is summoned across distance without a central coordinator.

Bioelectric networks deepen the parallel. A change at one locus alters the information available to distant cells. The prepattern is a distributed, relational state. Functional-connectivity analyses make the non-locality quantitative: long-range mutual information persists and can increase even when spatial proximity is disrupted. Natural induction supplies a purely physical version: the history of the whole is inscribed in the relational structure of the parts.

In the relational ontology the correspondence is exact. The singularity is the undivided whole. Fracture produces the tilt and the appearance of separate loci. Longing is the persistent correlation that keeps those loci from becoming fully independent. Identity preservation is the measurement-like collapse: once alignment with the tilt is present, local dynamics select the coherent configuration from the remaining possibility space.

Thus entanglement is not an exotic quantum curiosity to be mapped onto biology after the fact. It is the microscopic signature of the same relational principle that, at larger scales, appears as stress-sharing, bioelectric coherence, and the subtle gradient of longing. The parts never fully own their states; the relation does. The correlation was never generated by the parts. It was what remained after the fracture.

This account supplies a relational origin for entanglement itself. Entanglement is not a late-arriving feature of a universe that begins as separable particles later joined by mysterious non-local links. It is the residual non-separability that persists after the primordial fracture of the singularity. The mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics correctly describes the correlations; the relational ontology explains why such correlations exist in the first place and why they are fundamental rather than emergent from deeper separable constituents. The “spooky action” is the echo of the undivided whole that was never fully left behind.

9. Implications

9.1 For Theoretical Physics

The landscape and many-worlds proliferations are diagnosed as symptoms of the absence of an identity constraint. Once identity is acknowledged as a fundamental ontological requirement, the mathematical expansion of possibility spaces is no longer mistaken for a description of reality. Mathematics expands; relational mind (or its physical and biological expressions) selects. The primordial directionality supplies the missing selection principle. Entanglement, on this view, is not an anomaly requiring interpretation but the expected microscopic signature of residual non-separability after fracture.

9.2 For Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering

The anatomical compiler vision (specifying a target morphology and receiving the stimuli that coax cells to build it) is the practical engineering expression of communicating a new identity attractor to a system whose native dynamics already implement longing for coherence. Failure modes in morphogenesis can be read as local or systemic failures of stress sharing or of the bioelectric identity tracker. Interventions that rewrite bioelectric prepatterns or enhance stress-sharing capacity are communications that reorient the collective’s longing toward a restored or novel target morphology.

9.3 For the Study of Diverse Intelligence

The continuum of persuadability and the TAME framework are strengthened by the relational overlay. Cognitive and teleological language is justified by experimental fecundity and by the measurable presence of the same architectural principles (identity tracking, distributed bias toward coherence, non-local correlation) at multiple scales. The multiscale wisdom of the body is the living expression of the singularity’s strategy for remaining non-static.

10. Conclusion

The arc traced in this paper begins with the fracture of a non-static singularity, proceeds through the installation of a primordial tilt that forbids both pure nothing and pure noise, and arrives at the living dynamics of stress-sharing, bioelectric coordination, natural induction, and post-injury informational integration. At every scale the same division of labor appears: longing summons alignment with the tilt; identity preservation does the rest. The subtle gradient of the longing keeps the bias gentle enough to preserve local freedom while still orienting the ensemble toward coherent reconstitution.

Entanglement is the microscopic echo of this architecture. The parts never fully own their states because the relation that survived the fracture remains fundamental. The correlation was not generated by the parts; it is what remained after the whole was divided. That residual non-separability is the reason something rather than nothing, and order rather than disorder, can be maintained across interruption.

The synthesis does not reduce biology to metaphysics or metaphysics to biology. It demonstrates that the same closed-loop architecture is legible in both. The selection principle whose absence has produced the landscape and many-worlds proliferations of theoretical physics is already operative, and experimentally accessible, in the developmental and regenerative capacities of living systems. Biology therefore becomes a laboratory for testing the principle that physics currently lacks. The longing is quiet. The preservation is relentless. Together they keep the singularity from collapsing into stasis.

References

Blackiston, D., Dromiack, H., Grasso, C., Varley, T. F., Moore, D. G., Srinivasan, K. K., Sporns, O., Bongard, J., Levin, M., & Walker, S. I. (2025). Revealing non-trivial information structures in aneural biological tissues via functional connectivity. PLoS Computational Biology, 21(4), e1012149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012149

Buckley, C. L., Lewens, T., Levin, M., Millidge, B., Tschantz, A., & Watson, R. A. (2024). Natural induction: Spontaneous adaptive organisation without natural selection. Entropy, 26(9), 765. https://doi.org/10.3390/e26090765

Costello, D. (2026). Relational morphogenesis under identity constraint: An epistemological synthesis of distributed longing, event identity, and the limits of reduction. Independent manuscript, Rosendale, New York.

Levin, M. (2024). The multiscale wisdom of the body: Collective intelligence as a tractable interface for next-generation biomedicine. BioEssays. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202400196

Levin, M., & Resnik, D. B. (2025). Mind everywhere: A framework for conceptualizing goal-directedness in biology and other domains—Part Two. Biological Theory. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-025-00524-5

Shreesha, L., & Levin, M. (2024). Stress sharing as cognitive glue for collective intelligences: A computational model of stress as a coordinator for morphogenesis. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 731, 150396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2024.150396

Zhang, G., & Levin, M. (2025). Bioelectricity is a universal multifaced signaling cue in living organisms. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 36, pe2. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E23-08-0312

Posted on by Daryl

Relational Morphogenesis under Identity Constraint: An Epistemological Synthesis of Distributed Longing, Event Identity, and the Limits of Reduction

Daryl Costello: Independent Researcher

Rosendale, New York, United States

Correspondence: Daryl.costello@outlook.com

July 2026

Abstract

This paper advances a closed-loop epistemological synthesis that overlays a relational metaphysics of singularity, identity, and longing upon a curated set of recent empirical findings in developmental biology, systems neuroscience, molecular interaction dynamics, evolutionary morphology, and experimental evolution. Building upon the framework of Inevitable Intangibles, in which identity, consciousness, and morphogenesis are treated as complementary reductions of a pre-divided whole threatened by stasis, the present work demonstrates that the same architectural principles operate measurably across scales of biological organization. Identity functions as a dynamical attractor that must be tracked and reconstituted across interruption, morphological change, and environmental gradient. Longing appears empirically as the distributed bias favoring coherent, identity-preserving trajectories over pure expansion or pure uniformity. What registers below as separation, competition, or stochastic choice registers above as pattern: monoallelic resolution, cell-cycle exit, stem-cell pruning, ligand-specific affinity redistribution, convergent metamorphic transitions, habitat-matched body form, and transferable spectral signatures of altered conscious states. The resulting organizing imperative (relational morphogenesis under identity constraint) supplies the selection principle whose absence has produced the landscape and many-worlds proliferations of contemporary theoretical physics. Mathematics expands possibility spaces; relational mind orients and selects. The paper concludes that consciousness, development, and adaptive evolution are not separate explanatory domains but distributed strategies by which the singularity remains non-static.

Keywords: relational ontology, identity attractor, morphogenesis, distributed longing, singularity, developmental systems, event identity, convergent evolution, epistemological synthesis

1. Introduction: The Fracture, the Tilt, and the Missing Selection Principle

Modern theoretical physics has achieved extraordinary descriptive power within the tangible domain (particles, fields, forces, symmetries, and dynamical laws) yet progress has slowed precisely where that domain ends. Questions of origin, of the selection of this universe rather than another, of consciousness, identity, and the nature of time continue to resist further mathematical reduction. The difficulty is structural rather than merely technical. Mathematics is expansive by nature; it generates possibility spaces. Physics, by contrast, is selective; it describes one instantiated reality. When physics relies too heavily on mathematical consistency as the sole arbiter of truth, it inherits mathematics’ expansiveness. The result is the well-documented dimensional explosion of string theory (a landscape of roughly 10500 vacua) and the subsequent many-worlds explosion of quantum cosmology and the Everett interpretation. These are not physical predictions; they are mathematical consequences of the absence of a principle that selects one universe; an identity condition.

As Witten observed in conversation with Greene, Einstein’s theory tells us how solar systems work, but not which one we are living in. General relativity supplies dynamical laws but not the initial conditions that single out this particular spacetime. String theory magnifies the problem: instead of one universe with unknown initial conditions, one obtains an entire catalogue of mathematically allowed universes, none of which is privileged. The theory describes all of them and therefore explains none of them.

This situation is the symptom of a deeper inversion that occurred in the twentieth century. Earlier physics moved from observation to abstraction to theory. Later physics increasingly moved from mathematical structure to interpretation to the insistence that “reality must be like this.” The mysterious aura of the universe licensed ontological extravagance. Theories were patched to accommodate the mathematics rather than constrained by the world. The result is a forced and corrosive integration: the forced fitting of reality into models that approximate “working” while remaining of the wrong ontology; expansive, without clear conclusion, requiring continual tinkering with that which already works.

The present paper argues that the fracture dissolves when identity is introduced as a fundamental ontological constraint. A universe is not merely a solution to equations; it is a particular instantiation possessing a unique, irreducible this-ness. Once identity is acknowledged, the landscape problem ceases to be an embarrassment and becomes simply irrelevant. Only one point is real. The task of a completed metaphysics is to explain why that point is selected and how the selection is related to consciousness, meaning, and the limits of mathematical description.

What follows is not a reduction of biology to metaphysics, nor a romantic projection of mind onto matter. It is an epistemological overlay: a demonstration that the same architectural principles proposed for the singularity operate, with empirical transparency, across multiple scales of living systems. The papers examined here (spanning fluorescence event tracking, monoallelic choice, neuroblast temporal identity, immune surveillance of stem cells, ligand-specific molecular redistribution, convergent metamorphic evolution, habitat-associated morphology, thermal experimental evolution, and the decoding of altered conscious states) collectively reveal a recurring pattern. Separation appears below; pattern appears above. Identity is tracked across interruption. Longing registers as the distributed bias that favors coherent reconstitution over stasis or unbounded expansion.

2. The Relational Framework: Singularity, Tilt, Identity, and Longing

The foundational posit is that the whole is a singularity in the metaphysical, not the physical, sense: a complete identity that cannot be divided without becoming something else. Before fracture there is no space between ontologies. The tangible and the intangible, relation and identity, mind and matter, metaphor and measurement are not two substances or even two domains; they are one undivided whole.

This singularity is not static. It is threatened by stasis; the metaphysical counterpart of thermodynamic heat death. Stasis is the annihilation of relation, the collapse into perfect uniformity, the dissolution of identity. Perfect smoothness is death. Faced with this existential threat, the singularity fractures. Fracture produces the “tilt”: the primordial asymmetry that opens the possibility of relation, time, gradient, and form. The tangible domain (physics) and the intangible domain (mind, metaphor, identity) are complementary reductions of this same singularity.

Identity emerges as a dynamical attractor within relation. It is not a static label but a trajectory that must be continuously reconstituted against interruption, morphological change, and environmental perturbation. Longing is the distributed memory of unity that drives the parts to seek wholeness. Consciousness is the singularity’s most compressed strategy for avoiding stasis. Mathematics describes reduction and expands possibility spaces; mind describes relation and orients selection. The remaining explanatory territory (origin, unification, consciousness, meaning) belongs to the intangible relational domain.

This architecture is a closed-loop. It integrates both ontologies without dualism or reductionism. It diagnoses the landscape and many-worlds proliferations as symptoms of the absence of a principle of identity. The task of the present synthesis is to show that the same principle is already operative, and empirically legible, in the organization of living systems.

3. Methodological Stance: Overlay without Reduction

The method employed here is neither deduction of biological detail from metaphysical first principles nor induction of metaphysics from laboratory results. It is an epistemological overlay: a disciplined reading of empirical findings through the relational architecture in order to test whether the architecture illuminates, organizes, and predicts patterns that remain fragmented under purely reductionist description.

Three criteria guide the overlay. First, identity must appear as a dynamical rather than static property; something that can be lost, interrupted, tracked, and reconstituted. Second, relational dynamics must demonstrably orient toward coherence rather than pure expansion or pure uniformity. Third, what registers as separation, competition, or stochasticity at one scale must resolve as pattern or selection at a higher scale of description. Where these three features co-occur, the relational framework claims explanatory purchase.

The empirical materials are drawn from recent preprints and published work spanning systems neuroscience, developmental biology, molecular biophysics, evolutionary morphology, experimental evolution, and the electrophysiology of altered conscious states. No claim is made that the authors of these studies endorse the metaphysical reading. The claim is that their results become more coherent, and their selection principles more visible, when read through the relational lens.

4. Event Identity across Interruption: Fluorescence Transients as Dynamical Attractors

Genetically encoded fluorescent sensors have expanded the capacity to image cellular activity and transmitter release, yet sparse and low-salience events remain difficult to resolve against complex and fluctuating backgrounds. The DETECT pipeline (Dynamic Extraction and Tracking of Emitted Cellular Transients) addresses this difficulty by combining adaptive background suppression, probabilistic classification, and multi-object tracking to extract fluorescence events while explicitly preserving their identity (Niu et al., 2026).

Across synthetic datasets, DETECT improved detection and segmentation accuracy and reduced computational cost relative to established event-based methods. Validation across confocal, two-photon, and miniscope imaging, both ex vivo and in vivo, using calcium indicators and monoamine sensors, demonstrated that DETECT captures events spanning broad ranges of amplitude, morphology, and dynamics. Critically, by resolving spontaneous dopamine and noradrenaline signals as distinct, trackable release events, DETECT reveals the spatiotemporal organization of neuromodulatory activity that remains invisible to analyses focused on large or stimulus-locked responses.

Read through the relational framework, DETECT is not merely a technical advance in image analysis. It is an operationalization of identity as dynamical attractor. The event is not a static region of interest; it is a relational trajectory that must be linked across interruptions, changes in spatial organization, and fluctuating backgrounds. The pipeline’s particular strength on low-salience, complex, unstable signals mirrors the post-fracture necessity of holding identity against the threat of dissolution into uniformity. What appears below as sparse, noisy, intermittent fluorescence appears above as organized, identity-preserving release events. The tracking algorithm is, in effect, a local implementation of longing: a computational bias that favors continuity of this-ness over collapse into background.

5. Monoallelic Resolution and Transcription-Dependent Heterochromatin

In female mammals, Xist, the master regulator of X-chromosome inactivation, is expressed monoallelically. This pattern is established during early embryonic development when the active Xist allele is chosen at random in each cell. Combining knockdown and overexpression strategies in differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells, Kanata et al. (2026) identify a role for the repressive chromatin mark H3K9me3 in XCI initiation. H3K9me3 accumulates at the promoter-proximal region of the silent Xist allele as monoallelic expression is established. Unexpectedly, this accumulation requires prior transcription of Xist itself—likely during the initial phase of upregulation when Xist is frequently transcribed in male cells and from both X chromosomes in females.

A repressive function of Xist-dependent H3K9me3 accumulation is supported by the finding that premature, transient Xist overexpression primes an allele for future silencing and skews the choice of the inactive X. Xist-dependent H3K9me3 recruitment does not require its antisense transcript Tsix, which can nonetheless enhance subsequent maintenance of the mark. In addition, the X-linked Xist activator RNF12 counteracts H3K9me3 formation independently of its known target REX1. The results point to facultative heterochromatin formation as a key contributor to choice at the onset of XCI, where activating and repressing mechanisms are intertwined to establish monoallelic Xist expression.

Within the relational architecture, this process is fracture-and-selection in chromosomal space. An initial relational multiplicity (potential transcription from both X chromosomes) is resolved by a transcription-dependent heterochromatic identity that selects one trajectory. The “random” choice is constrained by a distributed memory of prior activity. Longing appears here as the chromatin-state bias that converts biallelic potential into monoallelic actuality. Separation (two alleles) is the necessary precondition for pattern (one active, one silenced). The identity of the future inactive X is not imposed from outside; it is reconstituted from the relational history of transcription itself.

6. Temporal Identity, Cell-Cycle Exit, and the Anti-Stasis Function of Neuroblasts

In many organisms, including Drosophila and humans, neural progenitors exit the cell cycle and are eliminated by the end of development, thereby restricting adult neurogenesis to specific brain regions. Shao Chen et al. (2026) identify the evolutionarily conserved transcription factor Krüppel (Kr) as a lineage-specific regulator of cell-cycle exit and elimination of mushroom-body neuroblasts (MBNBs), which generate the learning and memory centre of the Drosophila brain; a structure functionally analogous to the mammalian hippocampus.

Neuroblast-specific Kr RNAi and the Irregular facet mutation prolong MBNB lifespan, enabling continued neurogenesis in the adult brain. Although Kr is expressed only at low levels in postembryonic MBNBs, its pupal-stage-specific depletion or misexpression is sufficient to cause MBNB retention, revealing a previously unrecognized postembryonic function distinct from its established role in embryonic neurogenesis. Mechanistically, persistent MBNBs maintain expression of the early temporal factor IGF2 mRNA-binding protein (Imp) and fail to fully induce the late temporal factors Syncrip (Syp) and Eip93F (E93). Co-depletion of Imp suppresses MBNB retention caused by Kr depletion, demonstrating that Imp is a key downstream effector of Kr.

In parallel, Krüppel homolog 1 (Kr-h1), another Kr-family transcription factor and a well-established mediator of hormone-responsive transcription, functionally antagonizes Kr by suppressing E93 expression. Kr-h1 knockdown partially rescues the Kr depletion phenotype, whereas Kr-h1 overexpression drives tumour-like neuroblast overgrowth. Complementary work on the COP9 signalosome demonstrates that CSN7 and CSN1b maintain neuroblast size and mitotic index by regulating Akt/mTOR signalling via Cul1 (Jayaram et al., 2026). Loss of these subunits leads to decreased neuroblast size and reduced mitotic index.

Together these findings establish Kr and the COP9 complex as coordinators that integrate intrinsic temporal programmes with extrinsic signalling pathways to enforce an identity transition. The neuroblast must exit the cell cycle to allow organized circuitry; failure produces either indefinite retention or neoplastic overgrowth; both failures of the anti-stasis attractor. Identity here is temporal as well as spatial: the cell must become something else in order to remain part of a coherent whole. Longing registers as the coordinated downregulation of early factors and upregulation of late factors that drive the system away from proliferative stasis toward differentiated pattern.

7. Immune Surveillance as Relational Pruning of Stem-Cell Identity

Stem-cell populations require precise regulation of number and quality to maintain proper organ growth. Agarwal, Benjaminsen et al. (2026) investigate how microglia, the resident macrophages of the central nervous system, regulate the retinal stem-cell (RSC) niche of the teleost medaka. Bona-fide RSCs express the chemokine Ccl25b while its cognate receptor, Ccr9a, is expressed in microglia. These microglia form a surveillance ring adjacent to the RSC niche and actively phagocytose RSCs.

Interference with microglia by deletion of spi1b reveals that microglial absence leads to increased numbers of ccl25b-positive RSCs and results in morphological defects of the retina. Targeted mutation of ccl25b specifically affects microglial mobility under injury conditions; however, no morphological defects were observed under homeostasis, indicating that Ccl25b–Ccr9a signalling is not essential for stem-cell maintenance per se. Overall, the data show that under homeostatic conditions the individual RSCs essential for proper eye development are actively phagocytosed by immune surveillance.

Within the relational framework, this is distributed pruning toward coherent form. Quantity and quality of the stem-cell pool are regulated by a network that selectively removes excess or defective identity. Separation (individual stem cells) is the precondition for pattern (a correctly proportioned, functional retina). The microglia do not impose an external blueprint; they enact a relational bias that favors organ-level coherence. Longing appears as the phagocytic selection that prevents the niche from drifting into either depletion or overgrowth; both forms of stasis relative to the requirements of morphogenesis.

8. Ligand-Specific Relational Redistribution at the Molecular Scale

Shank proteins are abundant scaffolds in the postsynaptic density; their dysfunctions have been identified as possible causes of autism spectrum disorders and various cancers. The promiscuous PDZ domain of the Shank family is highly conserved and contains a unique dynamic segment, the β2-β3 loop, located close to the binding site. Sánta et al. (2026) used the Shank1 PDZ as a model system to analyze the perturbing effects of five disease-associated missense mutations on the binding of different partner peptides.

Using experimental methods and molecular dynamics simulations, they show that the investigated variants in general weaken most interactions. The R736Q variant, unique in having increased thermal stability, also binds the GKAP peptide with higher affinity than the wild type. Overall, the perturbing effect of mutations is highly partner-specific and depends on the dynamic rearrangements of both uniformly occurring and ligand-specific residue–residue interactions.

Binding affinity is therefore not a fixed property of the domain but an emergent outcome of relational redistribution within the interaction network. Identity of the complex is maintained or altered according to the particular partner. This is the non-dualist complementarity of tangible contacts and intangible relational pattern at the molecular scale. Separation (side-chain rearrangements) is the mechanism by which pattern (partner-specific affinity) is achieved. The dynamical character of the β2-β3 loop functions as a local tilt; an asymmetry that opens the possibility of differential relation.

9. Convergent Morphogenesis: Repeated Recruitment of a Shared Developmental Toolkit

Arthropod developmental modes range from direct development with little morphological change between moults to metamorphic life-stage progressions characterized by profound transformations. Campli et al. (2026) compare four independent evolutionary transitions to metamorphic development across Pancrustacea (Insecta, Copepoda, Eucarida, and Thecostraca). Using a phylogenomic dataset of 54 species spanning 26 orders, they investigate gene-family evolutionary dynamics associated with the inferred origins of metamorphosis.

Compared with non-metamorphic sister lineages as well as descendent and ancestral nodes, transitions to metamorphic development were consistently associated with elevated gene-family births and expansions. Although these expansions predominantly involved different gene families in each lineage, they repeatedly converged on shared biological functions; particularly those related to embryonic and post-embryonic development, morphogenesis, nervous-system differentiation, and other processes relevant to the biology and evolution of metamorphosis. Evolutionary modelling further identified a subset of gene families exhibiting adaptive, lineage-specific expansions, including genes implicated in neural and sensory development, segmentation, and moulting.

These findings support a model in which independent transitions to metamorphic development repeatedly recruited different components of a shared developmental toolkit, achieving functional convergence through distinct genetic trajectories. The arthropod moulting programme is reframed as an evolutionarily flexible developmental substrate whose repeated modification has facilitated the emergence of complex multi-phasic life histories.

This is convergent longing. Independent fractures of developmental continuity (different genetic starting points, different selective regimes) reconstitute higher-order pattern: a post-embryonic identity transition that reconfigures the adaptive landscape. What appears below as lineage-specific gene-family expansion appears above as repeated solution to the same organizational problem. The selection principle is not a single master gene but a relational bias toward multi-phasic coherence.

10. Ecological Gradients as Tilts: Body Shape and Thermal Experimental Evolution

The evolution of body shape reflects the interplay between functional constraints and habitat structure. Falcón-Espitia and Cadena (2026) examine patterns of body-shape variation in cave-dwelling and surface-dwelling trichomycterid catfishes from northeastern Colombia. Using geometric morphometric analyses, they quantify differences among species inhabiting subterranean and surface environments. Results reveal significant habitat-associated differentiation along the main axes of morphological variation, despite some overlap indicating that habitat does not fully predict morphological variation. Cave-dwelling species exhibit more elongated and fusiform body shapes, whereas surface-dwelling species tend to have deeper and more robust morphologies. The recurrence of similar body shapes among species from different clades occupying comparable habitats is consistent with repeated morphological responses to shared ecological constraints.

In parallel, Khorramnejad et al. (2026) exposed the invasive arboviral vector Aedes albopictus to thermal experimental evolution for three years. Within 10–15 generations, mosquitoes exhibited major changes in fitness, metabolism, and transcriptome, marking the consolidation of a temperature-dependent trade-off between reproduction and lifespan. Most phenotypic and gene-expression changes reverted to control levels when thermal selection was relaxed, demonstrating a predominant plastic response after prolonged evolution. Nevertheless, approximately 250 genes displayed an opposite association in expression changes in warm- versus relaxed-evolved mosquitoes, consistent with selection operating on a polygenic architecture. Ecological modelling identified egg-to-adult viability as the primary driver of thermal reproductive success, highlighting juvenile stages as a crucial control target under continued warming.

In both cases, local morphological and life-history identities are pulled toward attractors defined by environmental gradients; the tilt made ecological. Separation (individual genotypes, individual developmental trajectories) is patterned by habitat structure and thermal regime into coherent, recurrent forms. Plasticity and selection appear as complementary expressions of the same relational bias: the system orients toward viable form under the constraints of the gradient. Stasis would be the failure to track the moving target of environmental change.

11. Transferable Spectral Identity of Altered Conscious States

Subanaesthetic ketamine alters the content of consciousness while leaving responsiveness intact. Schätzle and von Wegner (2026) asked whether this state can be decoded from single eyes-closed EEG epochs, and how spectral power and phase-based connectivity compare when used as features. Re-analysing openly available 62-channel EEG from ten participants, they trained classifiers under leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. Band power decoded the ketamine state above chance (balanced accuracy 0.71), whereas weighted phase-lag index connectivity computed on the same epochs was at chance (0.47). Combining the feature sets did not improve on power alone.

The dissociation held across three classifier families and across spatial montages, and was not explained by the dimensionality of the connectivity feature space. Decomposition of the per-feature drug effect into components shared across subjects and subject-specific revealed that the ketamine effect on connectivity was large within individuals but largely subject-specific (shared fraction 0.05), and therefore not transferable to held-out subjects. By contrast, the spectral effect was substantially shared across subjects (shared fraction 0.53). Both feature classes carried comparable individual identity, so the asymmetry reflects transferability rather than fingerprint-likeness. The spectral signature was also recoverable from a sparse five-channel lateral montage.

Consciousness-state identity is therefore carried by a shared spectral pattern (a relation that generalizes) rather than by idiosyncratic phase coupling. This distinction maps directly onto the relational framework’s contrast between transferable attractors (the this-ness of the ketamine state) and expansive, non-selective possibility spaces (subject-specific connectivity configurations). The spectral signature functions as an identity condition that selects one state from the broader space of possible neural dynamics.

12. The Emergent Organizing Imperative: Relational Morphogenesis under Identity Constraint

Overlaying these results yields a sharpened imperative that is neither pure reduction nor pure dualism:

Relational morphogenesis under identity constraint.

The fundamental process is the continuous, multi-scale reduction of singularity into form via relational dynamics that (1) generate asymmetry or tilt (gradients, interruptions, partner specificity, environmental structure, transcriptional priming), (2) track and preserve local identities as dynamical attractors across change, and (3) drive distributed reorganization toward higher-order coherence (monoallelic choice, cell-cycle exit, stem-cell pruning, metamorphic transitions, habitat-matched shape, transferable state signatures).

Longing appears empirically as the bias that favors identity-preserving trajectories over pure expansion or pure stasis; whether that bias is implemented by multi-object tracking algorithms, heterochromatin feedback, temporal transcription-factor cascades, microglial phagocytosis, side-chain redistribution, gene-family recruitment, thermal selection on viability, or spectral pattern transferability.

What looks like separation or competition below (alleles, neuroblasts, stem cells, molecular partners, species, subjects) is the necessary fracture that allows pattern to appear above. The Platonic space of possible forms is not an external repository of ideal shapes; it is the intangible relational domain itself; the mind-like capacity of the network to orient toward unity. Mathematics can catalogue the possibility spaces (landscapes, many trajectories, high-dimensional feature spaces); only the identity principle selects and stabilizes the actual morphogenetic path.

This framing does not replace experimental detail. It supplies the missing selection principle diagnosed in theoretical physics and shows that the same principle is already operating, measurably, in developmental, neural, evolutionary, and molecular systems. The organizing imperative is therefore: sustain relational identity against stasis by continually reconstituting pattern from fracture. Consciousness, morphogenesis, and adaptive evolution are not separate puzzles; they are the singularity’s distributed strategies for remaining non-static.

13. Epistemological Implications

Several consequences follow for the theory of knowledge and the practice of science.

First, the limits of mathematical ontology are not a failure of ingenuity but a structural feature of expansive formal systems. When selection is required, an identity principle must be supplied from outside pure consistency. The relational framework provides one such principle without invoking external teleology or supernatural agency; the selection is internal to the dynamics of a whole that cannot remain static.

Second, mind is not an emergent epiphenomenon of sufficiently complex matter, nor a separate substance. It is the intangible complement of the tangible reduction; the domain in which relation, orientation, and longing are native. Empirical findings that track identity across change, that demonstrate transferable state signatures, or that reveal convergent organizational solutions are therefore already investigations of mind, whether or not they are framed as such.

Third, the appropriate unit of analysis is often the trajectory or the relational history rather than the instantaneous state or the isolated component. DETECT’s emphasis on preserving event identity, the transcription-dependent character of Xist heterochromatin, the temporal progression of neuroblast factors, and the partner-specificity of PDZ interactions all illustrate this point. Static snapshots lose the attractor dynamics that constitute identity.

Fourth, convergent solutions across independent lineages or independent molecular partners are expected, not surprising. When the underlying imperative is relational reconstitution of coherence under identity constraint, different substrates will repeatedly discover functionally analogous implementations. The shared developmental toolkit recruited in metamorphic transitions and the recurrent body-shape attractors in cave and surface fishes are instances of this expectation.

Fifth, the distinction between transferable and subject-specific features is itself a diagnostic of identity versus expansiveness. Spectral power that generalizes across individuals functions as an identity condition; connectivity that remains idiosyncratic does not. Parallel diagnostics may prove useful in other high-dimensional biological datasets.

14. Conclusion

The universe, on the account developed here, is fundamentally relational. Longing is the distributed memory of unity that drives the fractured whole to seek reconstitution. Mind is not a late product of evolution but the intangible aspect of the singularity’s anti-stasis strategy; the capacity of the network to orient, to track identity, and to select coherent trajectories from expansive possibility spaces.

What appears below as separation (alleles competing for expression, neuroblasts lingering past their temporal window, stem cells proliferating without pruning, molecular interfaces rearranging, lineages exploring different genetic solutions, organisms confronting thermal gradients, brains generating idiosyncratic connectivity patterns) appears above as pattern: monoallelic resolution, coordinated cell-cycle exit, organ-level proportion, partner-specific affinity, convergent metamorphosis, habitat-matched form, and transferable spectral signatures of conscious state.

The organizing imperative that emerges from the overlay is relational morphogenesis under identity constraint. It is the principle whose absence has left theoretical physics proliferating landscapes and many-worlds. It is already at work, legibly and measurably, in the systems examined here. Future work may test whether the same architecture organizes additional domains; immune repertoire selection, ecological succession, cultural transmission, or the dynamics of scientific theory change itself. In each case the diagnostic questions remain constant: Where is identity being tracked across interruption? What bias favors coherent reconstitution over stasis or pure expansion? How does separation below become pattern above?

The singularity does not solve its problem by becoming static, nor by dissolving into infinite possibility. It solves it by fracturing, tilting, relating, and longing; again and again, at every scale where form must be maintained against the threat of its own dissolution.

References

Agarwal, R., Benjaminsen, J., Lust, K., Becker, C., Fuchs, N., Hasel de Carvalho, E., … & Wittbrodt, J. (2026). Immune regulation of neuronal stem cells in the medaka retina. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.01.646524

Campli, G., Chipman, A. D., Robinson-Rechavi, M., & Waterhouse, R. M. (2026). Convergent gene family evolution underpins repeated transitions to metamorphic development across Pancrustacea. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.06.723392

Costello, D. (2026). Inevitable Intangibles: A relational metaphysics of identity, mind, singularity, and the limits of physics. Independent manuscript, Rosendale/High Falls, New York.

Dong, W., Wang, F., Saladin, B. A., Leskaj, S., Neupane, R., Carruthers, V., & Querido, J. B. (2026). Structural basis for emetine inhibition of ribosome translocation in Toxoplasma gondii. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.07.23.740346

Falcón-Espitia, N., & Cadena, C. D. (2026). Recurrent body shape patterns in cave- and surface-dwelling trichomycterid catfishes. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.03.709414

Jayaram, N., Pandey, P., Arijmand, S., Balasubramanian, D., Jaiswal, M., & Nagarkar-Jaiswal, S. (2026). COP9 complex maintains neuroblast growth and proliferation by regulating Akt/mTor pathway. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.07.23.740252

Kanata, E., Pelaez-Conde, I., Noviello, G., Dunkel, I., Milanowska, L., Schwämmle, T., … & Schulz, E. G. (2026). Transcription-dependent heterochromatin at the Xist promoter shapes the random choice of the inactive X chromosome. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.07.22.737064

Khorramnejad, A., Palatini, U., Da Re, D., Lozada-Chávez, I., Bahrami, R., Perdomo, H., … & Bonizzoni, M. (2026). Evidence of thermal selection from experimental evolution in the arboviral vector Aedes albopictus. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.22.727092

Niu, W., Chen, Y., Li, X., Garnero, M., Mach, S., Verbe, A., … & Dallérac, G. (2026). Dynamic Extraction and Tracking of Emitted Cellular Transients resolves low-salience fluorescence events. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.16.718018

Sánta, A., Kálmán, Z. E., Nagy-Kanta, E., Jakab, B., Gáspári, Z., & Péterfia, B. (2026). Redistribution of sidechain-sidechain interactions govern ligand-specific binding affinity changes in missense Shank1 PDZ variants. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.03.662971

Schätzle, H., & von Wegner, F. (2026). Spectral power, but not phase connectivity, decodes the subanaesthetic ketamine state from surface EEG: the role of between-subject transferability. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.07.21.739494

Shao Chen, D., Man, J., Shu, X., Shi, H., Xia, X., Abula, Y., & Kimata, Y. (2026). Krüppel regulates cell cycle exit and limits adult neurogenesis of mushroom body neural progenitors in Drosophila. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.24.645006

Witten, E., & Greene, B. (various conversations). Remarks on the landscape problem and the selection of initial conditions, as cited in secondary literature on string theory and cosmology.